<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jason Paschal&#039;s Blog &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonpaschal.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonpaschal.com</link>
	<description>Blog Blah Ball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 09:59:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome: Fast, But Retarded</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonpaschal.com/2010/06/03/google-chrome-fast-but-retarded/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jasonpaschal.com/2010/06/03/google-chrome-fast-but-retarded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 08:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mellomutt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retarded]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonpaschal.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a list of some basic elements that I require that Chrome ignores/craps on. First, Let me just say that I had to open Firefox to even post this story.  Chrome wouldn&#8217;t process the rich text plugin I&#8217;m using (FCKEditor) and it ignored other basic elements in terms of display for this CMS.  IE, Firefox&#8230;works fine.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a list of some  basic elements that I require that Chrome ignores/craps on. <img src="../sites/all/modules/fckeditor/fckeditor/editor/images/spacer.gif" alt="" /></p>
<h2><span id="more-6"></span>First,</h2>
<p>Let me just say that I had to open Firefox to even post this  story.  Chrome wouldn&#8217;t process the rich text plugin I&#8217;m using  (FCKEditor) and it ignored other basic elements in terms of display for  this CMS.  IE, Firefox&#8230;works fine.  Whatever. I know I need to update  this CMS [author's note: I've since switch to another CMS since writing this], but to just ignore basic/standard/popular JS and CSS?  Not cool.  I could be convinced that this is actually smart and cool, but you&#8217;d have to be naked and female.</p>
<h2>2) New Tabs WTF</h2>
<div>
<p>I had to install an extension to have Chrome just open a blank  page in a new tab.  By default, Chrome goes all Hitler on new tabs.  It  displays a thumbnailed list of pages you&#8217;ve recently looked at.</p>
</div>
<div>I  suppose they assume that a) you&#8217;re the only person using your computer,  or b) you don&#8217;t care if people know you&#8217;ve been looking at vintage  lesbian incest bondage porn.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>Well, I <em>do</em> care.  So I went to Chrome Options, and, yep,  you can&#8217;t change new tab behaviour.  You have zero choice in the  matter.  Firefox gives you a choice.  However, there is a Chrome  extension that allows you to simply display a blank page in a new tab.   Installed it.  Worked great.  But it&#8217;s the principle of the thing.  Why  did I have to bother?  Showing your page history thumbnails in a new tab  by default should be an &#8220;opt-in&#8221; sort of process.  Like, I don&#8217;t know, a  little window that pops up and says, &#8220;Do you want the world to know  about your deviant interests?  Check the box below.&#8221;  Sometimes I want  to show people some stuff online.  I don&#8217;t want any new tab I open to  taint the carefully constructed facade I put up between me and the  world.</p>
</div>
<p>If Chrome were a car, bumper stickers would be applied by the  manufacturer.</p>
<h2>3) Friggin&#8217; status bar.</h2>
<div>
<p>There isn&#8217;t one in Chrome.  Hover over a link,  and a little bubble appears in the bottom left corner of the browser  with the URL.  But not necessarily the full URL.  Nope.  The bubble only  extends through a 3rd of the browser space.  So the end of most URLs  get cut off, and to me, it&#8217;s the most important part.  It&#8217;s like, why  bother showing <em>any</em> of the URL?  If you just want to make sure  people are certain of the domain, then why not just show the domain?   Someone had to code it so it shows the ellipses at the end when it gets  cut off.  Someone had to put in &#8220;statusbubble.width=33%&#8221;.  You couldn&#8217;t  make that adjustable?  You couldn&#8217;t make that an option?  You had to be  Hitlers about it?  You had to be dicks?</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>There are no extensions that fix this.  Chrome is stuck with this  retarded behaviour.<br />
Maybe they just decided to be all maverick and question the whole  existence of status bars.  It&#8217;s been nearly two years since this issue  was brought to the attention of Chrome developers.  They refuse to fix  it.  And believe me, it&#8217;s an issue.  Two years of comments attest to  that.  They do say they will get to it, but have to work through other  issues first.  Oh, right, excuse us.  Probably more important things  than basic usability.</p>
<p>If Chrome were a car, it&#8217;d go really fast, but you wouldn&#8217;t know where   you&#8217;re going.</p>
<h2>4) No simple on/off for Javascript/Java.</h2>
<p>Firefox has some great  extensions for toggling JS and Java on the fly.  None for Chrome.  You <em>can</em> turn JS on and off in Chrome, but it&#8217;s several clicks and a few windows  deep.  I&#8217;ve got some really handy buttons that do the same thing in  Firefox.  Where are those buttons located?  You guessed it.  In my  frakkin&#8217; status bar.  Chrome, Chrome, Chrome.  You mean well.  But ffs,  how about making a browser?</p>
<p>If Chrome were a car, you could drive at night, but you couldn&#8217;t dim  your lights for oncoming traffic.</p>
<h2>In conclusion,</h2>
<p>As hard as it is for me to say (since I really enjoy google search, gmail and google docs), screw Google Chrome.  At least for the time being.  Fix  your shit, and we&#8217;ll try again.</p>
<p>If Chrome were a car, the test drive  would not have sold me.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jasonpaschal.com/2010/06/03/google-chrome-fast-but-retarded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

